View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Grimmelshausen
Cutthroat
Posts: 285
1811 Gold -
|
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What about the length of the battle? Is that a determining factor on how much gold you get as well, or is it completely irrellevant, as there seems to be no turn limit? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rupertlittlebear
Helmsman
Posts: 4545
10381 Gold -
|
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Turn limit?
Ain't no such thing. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jbsmith
Cutthroat
Posts: 285
835 Gold -
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 4:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
I like to take position on the high ground and let the foe come to me.
if open ground,pirates in front musketmen in back.
The musketmen shoots 'em up as the foe advances and the pirates charge when to moment is right.
the defender on the highground gets an advantage.
Conversely, Attacking Downhill the attacker gets an advantage too.
If the hill has trees-as Eric Cartman would say--"SWEEET"
i line them up Pirate-Musket-,m,p,m and keep at least one platoon of pirates in back as a mobile reserve, or as ambush. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cp. Kain
Gunner
Posts: 535
4815 Gold -
|
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
- Ha...Please don't consider it just braggin', but when i first attcked Montalban, i didn't know he had a bunch of savages there.
- We be about 100 against dat landlubbers...And ME BE A ROGUE. Twas like "one-two-three-four...ok...one-two-three-four-five? ok..SIX-SEVEN??? EIGHT-NINE-TEN...??? BLAST!!!!"
- Had officers, bucaneers and two pirates. And won leaving me half the officers and all bucaneers. First it was standing in the bushes, and then just before the bushes.
- One lil hinty - every time you be fightin' - turn on the grid! It be sometimes extremely helpful.
- Checkmate! _________________
Perhaps on the rare occasion pursuing the right course demands an act of Rock'n'Roll, Rock'n'Roll itself can be the right course? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kvollmer
Cutthroat
Posts: 310
6103 Gold -
|
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 3:48 pm Post subject: gold is less important |
|
|
Gold is very important to the game but I find that gold isn't relativly that important in the capturing of cities. You can get tons of points with the english if they are at war with the spanish and you capture a spanish port and make it english.
The most I ever got from a city was like 10,000 gold. Now thats a decent amout but its not a ton.
I don't typically go after big huge well defended cities preferring to keep smaller crews (about 200 men in size at max) and just going after ships and other targets of opprotunity. I find that I can keep my crew morale
(and morale as in happiness has an E at the end. moral is talking about your personal feelings as to whats is good or evil) higher for longer if they are smaller. I may not get the sheer gold weight of recruiting an army and attacking large cities but feel like I'm getting more gold per man.
That may just be because I'm better at fencing then I am at land battles. (Beating a garrison outnumbered two to 1 is difficult for me but sometimes doable) _________________ Sincerly,
Kirk Vollmer
Don't ever call me Captain Kirk.
Valparaiso University Alumni; Class of 2004 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DJ1
Cutthroat
Posts: 257
11541 Gold -
|
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fossaman wrote: | I personally like to fight with a no more than 2/3 disadvantage, but I have done 1/2 and even 1/3 succesfully. This is a great summary of cautious tactics. However, you forgot my favorite tactic: Bottlenecking. I love using rocks to force the enemy to come to me one at a time. Also, when a path towards your units is plugged, the enemy takes an alternate route. This means that when the bottleneck is full, units to the rear go the other way. Then they advance when it's open. Then they retreat again, etc...This tactic allows you to take the best advantage of your buccaneer's abilities. |
I always use that tactic as well... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kvollmer
Cutthroat
Posts: 310
6103 Gold -
|
Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2005 4:58 pm Post subject: Too easy |
|
|
That is a pretty conservative ratio and it would be rather easy to win like that. The enemy to me seems to over expose its flank a lot. They also really lack any good melee fighters save for their cav. (which I take out on sight)
It sounds a lot like everyone likes to use their Bucs and the pirates and officers supporting them. I prefer to use the bucs to support the pirates and officers because of the exposed flanks and weak melee. Although I do belive bucs have a one square greater range the enemy infantry. (Is that true?) _________________ Sincerly,
Kirk Vollmer
Don't ever call me Captain Kirk.
Valparaiso University Alumni; Class of 2004 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fossaman
Gunner
Posts: 726
3515 Gold -
|
Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2005 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, it is. And don't get me wrong, I like using my melee units: But the buccaneers get the first shot. I wear them down with ranged attacks, and then ambush from trees or high ground if possible with melee units. _________________
Like my fossa? He's a pirate! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
van boelken
Seaman
Posts: 174
492 Gold -
|
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 11:53 pm Post subject: YES! |
|
|
Methinks that bucaniers should be stronger and the percentage of landed shots should also be higher. I wish there's an option to take few hand-cannons with the crew, as it was normall to do back then. Cavalry should be lured in woods. Then you can attack them head-on and send them back running, shiting their pants. As for other units, they should always be attacked from flanks, or rear. If you attack head-on try to gain higer ground for bonus.
My personal record: 120 men against 200 Spanish men succesfuly plundering Maracaibo. In seocnd fight I reposesed it for Dutch (Haarr).
All that be done on Swashbuckler!
Share your expereince with me!
GOOOOOOD HHHUUUNNNNTINGG!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GreyFox
Swabbie
Posts: 101
663 Gold -
|
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well,you must consider 17th century rifles and pistols were quite unaccurate relatively to now.
That's why they used to be shot up close.
Thus from a distance,I suppose it's normal many of the shots don't land there.
I usually put the pirates up front and in cover and always shoot the bucaneers first,before having the pirates attack a target,to wound him,maybe even frighten him.
Never let the enemy get the high ground,and try to get flanking bonus when possible.
If you see any cavalry,get all of your pirates somewhere they cant be attacked from plains.
Finnally,upon the sight of artillery just keep your men hidden so they won't be spotted in the first place.
The map often allows for a group of pirates to go around by the woods and strike them from behind. _________________ "Those who are skilled in combat do not become angered, those who are skilled at winning do not become afraid. Thus the wise win before they fight, while the ignorant fight to win." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Evasive Maneuvers
Swabbie
Posts: 57
1479 Gold -
|
Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 2:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
even at 80/225 you need a lot of luck and stategy _________________ Broadsides are stupid. Whats the point of both ships being damaged. If you evade them only they will be damaged. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mr. Blue
Rigger
Posts: 1947
68931 Gold -
|
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 5:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
GreyFox wrote: |
Finnally,upon the sight of artillery just keep your men hidden so they won't be spotted in the first place.
|
What artillery? I've never seen any, or even read of anyone seeing any. _________________ " ... the mistakes that we male and female mortals make when we have our own way might fairly raise some wonder that we are so fond of it. " George Eliot |
|
Back to top |
|
|
loki59
Rigger
Posts: 1082
24252 Gold -
|
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mr. Blue wrote: | GreyFox wrote: |
Finnally,upon the sight of artillery just keep your men hidden so they won't be spotted in the first place.
|
What artillery? I've never seen any, or even read of anyone seeing any. | You're right that they don't exist in the game, but they were considered initially. However, the developers left them on the cutting room floor.
The .dds files for the cannons for each nation are in the Assets folder, artillery_cannon_s.dds, artillery_cannon_d.dds, etc...
pedia_landbattle_artillery
PS, How's the Missus doin? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mr. Blue
Rigger
Posts: 1947
68931 Gold -
|
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thank'ee for askin'. The Missus is doin' well. The recession has battered us, but we are weatherin' the storm. She's still crazy about that little imp of hers - he's 3 years old now.
Now, help out an ignorant ol' salt water thief, will ye? Is there a way that I can mod those spendid cannon ye showed me into me game, or was Greyfox just pullin' our legs? Seems to me that thar's no point in tellin' us how to fight artillery if thar's none to be found. _________________ " ... the mistakes that we male and female mortals make when we have our own way might fairly raise some wonder that we are so fond of it. " George Eliot |
|
Back to top |
|
|
loki59
Rigger
Posts: 1082
24252 Gold -
|
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 4:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nope, no chance of getting them into the game. Although the .dds files (skins) exist, the 3-d .NIF files for them are not to be found in the assets folder. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|